<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My notes from BayCHI, February 2002</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradlauster.com/archives/190/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradlauster.com/archives/190</link>
	<description>On User Experience Design and life, since 2000. Now in New York City!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Lauster</title>
		<link>http://bradlauster.com/archives/190/comment-page-1#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Lauster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2002 01:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradlauster.com/?p=190#comment-110</guid>
		<description>While writing down my notes, I found I couldn&#039;t find bibliograph in the dictionary, so I emailed Geoff Nunberg.

Here&#039;s what he had to say (I added the link):
&lt;blockquote&gt;Etymologically, epigraphy means &quot;writing on&quot; (i.e., a surface, etc.) but I think yours is a good definition. The best modern work on epigraphy is Armando Petrucci&#039;s book La Scrittura, which was published in English as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0226663868/bradlaustercom&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Public Lettering&lt;/a&gt; -- a better title than the original, I think. The opposing term is bibliographic. When I consulted the American Heritage, with whom I&#039;m associated, I discovered that we didn&#039;t have the relevant sense for that word. The OED does give a sense for bibliography as &quot;the writing of books,&quot; but says it&#039;s obsolete. My impression though is that this sense is current in this particular literature, in several languages. (I&#039;ll see whether I can get this sense included in future AHD editions.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;So, maybe my email will result in an addition to the American Heritage Dictionary. You&#039;ve got to admit, that&#039;s pretty cool! Thanks to Geoff for letting me post his email to bradlauster.com.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While writing down my notes, I found I couldn&#8217;t find bibliograph in the dictionary, so I emailed Geoff Nunberg.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what he had to say (I added the link):</p>
<blockquote><p>Etymologically, epigraphy means &#8220;writing on&#8221; (i.e., a surface, etc.) but I think yours is a good definition. The best modern work on epigraphy is Armando Petrucci&#8217;s book La Scrittura, which was published in English as <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0226663868/bradlaustercom" rel="nofollow">Public Lettering</a> &#8212; a better title than the original, I think. The opposing term is bibliographic. When I consulted the American Heritage, with whom I&#8217;m associated, I discovered that we didn&#8217;t have the relevant sense for that word. The OED does give a sense for bibliography as &#8220;the writing of books,&#8221; but says it&#8217;s obsolete. My impression though is that this sense is current in this particular literature, in several languages. (I&#8217;ll see whether I can get this sense included in future AHD editions.)</p></blockquote>
<p>So, maybe my email will result in an addition to the American Heritage Dictionary. You&#8217;ve got to admit, that&#8217;s pretty cool! Thanks to Geoff for letting me post his email to bradlauster.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

